CwCheat Support

[王动字别情]

I found (at least)3 bugs about codes' functions in ppsspp's CWcheat;



Bug1-----------duplication of pointer codes-------------------
The codes like this form:
_L 0x6aaaaaaa 0xbbbbbbbb
_L 0xqqq00002 0xcccccccc
_L 0x1sssssss 0x00000000 (Please pay attention to the red characters)
The code up there is a kind of duplication function from one potiner to another in psp's CWcheat.
But it comes out as a different effect in PPSSPP .
The effect seems as same sa a compressed multilevel pointer code.
But a correct compressed multilevel pointer code suppose to be written like this：
_L 0x6aaaaaa 0x000000 bb
_L 0xqqqDnnnn 0xcccccccc
_L 0x9sssssss 0x000000dd (Please pay attention to the blue characters,the combination form is different from the red's above there)





Bug2-----------about "_L 0x00000000 0x00000000"-------------------
When the code "_L 0x00000000 0x00000000" is under a condition code (such as _L 0xE1150000 0x3170005A)
And there are some codes below that but also under the condition
In this situation,the latter ones will all out of the limit (from the condition up there)

Maybe some cheating softwares in psp do have this function(0x00000000 0x00000000 can cancel all condition above it).
But in the case of ppsspp,it will get chaos with other similar codes.
for example:
_L 0x41700010 0x00060004
_L 0x00000000 0x00000000
The codes up there should make characters in some addresses all become 00000000.
But in ppsspp,it also makes the codes below that "0x00000000 0x00000000" out of the limited they should in
I think that's a big reason that why so many ordinary codes can not run correctly
In my opinion, cancel a condition is not a quite useful function,without it seems better




Bug3----------- compare codes-------------------
Codes like this form:
_L 0xDaaaaaaa 0xbbbbbbbb
_L 0xnnnnnnnn 0x0000000R
are invalid.
This is a kind of condition code,means when the number at adress aaaaaaaa (4-equal to\5-not equal to\6-less than\7-more than\) at bbbbbbbb,next nnnnnnnn codes will be activated.
R means compare the 2 addresses by 0-single byte\1-double byte \2-four byte.
Codes like these can only be written by this form


-------------------





I think my English is not good enough.
Does anybody understand what I'm saying?