Benchmarking your device with PPSSPP

[vitality19]

System CPU(and speed in ghz/mhz): 1 ghz
System RAM: 512 mb
System GPU type: PowerVR 540
System OS: Android (ICS 4.0.4) CM9
System device type(PC, Tablet, Phone, other): Samsung Captivate

Cpu doesn't seem to matter much since I overclocked and underclocked it(400-1400 mhz) and still got the same result. Although in games overclocking helps a bit. Maybe if I overclock gpu, it will give me more speed. But I heard that in some phones cpu and gpu are linked and thus overclocking cpu - speeds up gpu.

       

[Donel]

System CPU(and speed in ghz/mhz): Intel Core i7 980x @ 4.57 GHz
System RAM: 12 GB DDR3
System GPU type: AMD Radeon HD 5850 1GB GDDR5
System OS: Windows 7 SP1 x64
System device type(PC, Tablet, Phone, other): PC/Desktop

Incredible how Geforce drivers and architectures in general are less CPU bond than their AMD counterparts. Look at the CPU clock I need to get this score. I run my CPU daily at 4.22 GHz, at my daily clocks, my score is much lower:



My VGA is a little old, I have a Geforce GTX 770 on the way. I hope to see a big improvement on the score.

@daxtsu: Did you use XP Mode? Your windows UI is very classic looking. Disabling aero didn't yeld any improvement on my scores.

[[Unknown]]

Donel: pretty sure that's Windows 8 in his screenshot, but solarmystic's looks like classic.

-[Unknown]

[Donel]

True, I think I got cofused with solarmystic's screen just above.

Is Windows 8 performance any better for single threaded applications?

[solarmystic]

@Donel and @[Unknown]

Yep, my Core 2 rig is on the Windows 7 classic skin. No Aero or other visual enhancements allowed. As you've observed performance becomes really, really CPU limited at lower rendering resolutions required for the test. (2X RR)

The P4 is obviously on XP SP3.

[Henrik]

Heh, cube.elf is probably the worst emulation benchmark around. It does nearly no emulation processing, it will measure the fillrate of your GPU, pretty much.

[Orphis]

(06-04-2013 04:34 PM)daxtsu Wrote:  Render Resolution: 2x(not 1x, we want to see GPU performance more than CPU performance)

I didn't know that drawing ~30 triangles with a simple texture each frame counted as a benchmark for GPU performance!

[vnctdj]

(06-08-2013 09:17 PM)Orphis Wrote:  

(06-04-2013 04:34 PM)daxtsu Wrote:  Render Resolution: 2x(not 1x, we want to see GPU performance more than CPU performance)

I didn't know that drawing ~30 triangles with a simple texture each frame counted as a benchmark for GPU performance!

Haha ! ^^
You're right !

[KerrangR]

Runing the last x32 build



System CPU: Intel Dual Core E5300 [email protected]
System RAM: 2x1GB DDR2
System GPU type: Nvidia Geforce 9500 GT 1GB DDR3
System OS: Windows 8 x64
System device type: PC

[Danyal Zia]

(06-05-2013 06:54 PM)solarmystic Wrote:  Okay I know I've made an entry using my ancient Core 2 laptop, but I just tried it on my even older decrepit 8 year old Pentium 4 desktop rig running XP, and the results blew my mind. Seriously.



System CPU: Intel Pentium 4 630 3.0 GHz (with HT)
System RAM: 1 GB DDR2 RAM
System GPU type: ATI Radeon X800XL 256 MB GDDR3 VRAM
System OS: Windows XP 32-Bit SP3
System device type: PC

Seriously, I couldn't believe the VPS readings. My P4 rig scores higher in this test compared to my Core 2 rig which is on paper 4 times more powerful and has a gfx card that is on paper at least 3 times more powerful. It seems like Windows XP really is a hell of a drug lol, we may have to actually take into account performance differences introduced by different OSes. Also, it seems like AMD/ATI's older XP OGL drivers may be superior to their newer ones for Windows 7/8.

(I tripled checked again and again for accuracy, and this is lowest measurement. All settings are as required by Daxtsu's first post.)

Which version of atioglxx.dll are you using with X800XL?

[solarmystic]

(06-28-2013 07:00 PM)Danyal Zia Wrote:  Which version of atioglxx.dll are you using with X800XL?

This one from AMD:-

http://www2.ati.com/drivers/10-2_legacy_...dd_ccc.exe

[VIRGIN KLM]

(06-08-2013 09:12 PM)Henrik Wrote:  Heh, cube.elf is probably the worst emulation benchmark around. It does nearly no emulation processing, it will measure the fillrate of your GPU, pretty much.

Not to mention that some NVidia drivers give wrong FPS/VPS readings on it without framelimmit (9999.9 VPS).
I think a game like the demo of Ridge Racer 2 could be a great Benchmarking tool.

[Ranguvar]

System CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.5GHz
System RAM: 16GiB DDR3-1600
System GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GiB @ 1125MHz
System OS: Windows 7 SP1 x64
System device type: PC

[Its Me‼]

System CPU: AMD Athlon™ 7550 Dual-CoreProcessor
System RAM: DDR3 2GB+ready boost 16GB transcend
System GPU type: homemade ( from two Nvidia GeForce GT 220)
System OS: Windows 7 32 bit
System device type: PC

[Danyal Zia]

(06-28-2013 08:14 PM)solarmystic Wrote:  

(06-28-2013 07:00 PM)Danyal Zia Wrote:  Which version of atioglxx.dll are you using with X800XL?

This one from AMD:-

http://www2.ati.com/drivers/10-2_legacy_...dd_ccc.exe

I'm using that latest version too for my X800 as well. Do you have problems running games with it? GTA VCS doesn't run with it (shows black and glitched screen), I guess buffered rendering is not really compatible with ATI cards.